Independent Catholic News logo Welcome Visitor
Saturday, October 1, 2016
Court challenge to morning-after pill
Comment Email Print
 Today, pro-life campaigners in London will be calling for a judicial review on the legality of selling the morning-after pill over the counter without prescription. The hearing takes place at 10.30 a.m. in Court Two, the Royal Courts of Justice, The Strand. The presiding judge will be Mr Justice Scott Baker. Mr John Smeaton, national director of the Society for the Protection of Unborn Children, said: "The government's statutory instrument which reclassified the Levonelle-2 morning-after pill is a threat to the health of the nation and, more especially, to the youth of the nation. The standard dosage of the morning-after pill delivers 50 times the dosage of the daily mini-pill contraceptive, even though no adequate tests have been conducted into its long-term impact on health. "Major television and press reports have highlighted the fact that under-age girls are able to obtain morning-after pills from pharmacies in spite of the 16 years age limit. The policy therefore represents a real danger to young girls and women. Provision of the morning-after pill is not entered on a woman's medical records, and her GP is only informed if she agrees. "The morning-after pill offers no protection against sexually transmitted diseases. Between 1995 and 1998 when the number of prescriptions for the drug was rising towards one million per year, the incidence of chlamydia among 16 to 19-year-olds was increasing by 28 per cent per year. Furthermore, the greater availability of the morning-after pill will not reduce the numbers of unwanted pregnancies or abortions. "The abortion rate per 1,000 resident women in 1991 was 13.06, and by 1998 this had risen to 13.92. During this time, use of the morning-after pill rose four to five-fold. "The government's statutory instrument is an attempt to circumvent the Abortion Act 1967, which provides such limited supervision of abortion as there is. It ushers in an entirely unsupervised 'abortion by pill' procedure. It is not right for the government to impose such a burden on pharmacists by allowing them to commit criminal acts under the Offences Against the Person Act 1861. "By its action, SPUC is not simply seeking to stop the unlawful killing of early-developing unborn children. It also aims to protect women and young girls from harm, and pharmacists from criminal liability when the dangers which are so obvious begin to result in actual harm to those who have obtained the drug from chemists' shops."
Share:  Bookmark and Share
Tags: None


Powered by Bondware
News Publishing Software

The browser you are using is outdated!

You may not be getting all you can out of your browsing experience
and may be open to security risks!

Consider upgrading to the latest version of your browser or choose on below: