LONDON - 1 May 2006 - 588 words
Film
review: Shooting Dogs
Fr Peter Malone
(Fr Peter is president
of SIGNIS the World Catholic Association for Communication)
This is an impressive cinematic achievement.
It is also a fine portrayal of a priest and the Catholic Church.
However, the subject of this film is one of the most shameful
episodes in recent human history: the genocide in Rwanda, 1994.
As the dominant Hutus massacred the Tutsis - 800,000 men, women
and children were brutally hacked by machetes or shot from April
to July - the UN peacekeeping force stood by their mandate of
not intervening, to shoot only when shot at. And the superpowers
discussed the definition and application of 'genocide'. These
events took place at the same time as the wars in the Balkan peninsula
where the UN and other nations intervened militarily.
David Belton, who co-wrote this story and has produced the film
for BBC Films, was in fact a BBC director for Newsnight and was
present at the events portrayed in the film. He had also reported
from Bosnia and asks the questions about race and racism concerning
intervention in the Balkans and non-intervention in Africa.
Shooting Dogs refers to the experience of dogs outside the school
grounds, where over two thousand Tutsis took refuge and are being
sheltered by the resident priest. It is also the designated base
for the UN troops. As the dogs scavenge the many brutalised corpses
lying out in the streets, the UN chief says they must be shot
for hygiene's sake and to save lives. The priest ironically asks
why they can shoot dogs and not the marauding gangs who are butchering
innocent people in full view.
The film is structured in diary form - covering six days in April
2004 and confined to the school and its surroundings. The opening
scenes take us into the daily routine, ordinary things, sports,
classes, Mass. Officials turn up to scrutinise the presence of
Tutsis. Lists are compiled. When the president is killed by
rocket attack, the guns begin to fire and the rampage begins.
The president's UN security guard are executed. No one is safe.
Then the UN troops retreat to the airport taking the Europeans
but leaving the Tutsis. While there are many Tutsi characters
to empathise with, the screenplay focuses on an idealistic young
volunteer teacher (Hugh Dancy) and the shock he experiences and
his moral crises in what he can and cannot do. It then centres
on the veteran missionary, Fr Christopher, who has spent thirty
years in Rwanda. (David Belton says that the priest on whom he
based this character was, in fact, from Bosnia). Fr Christopher
is one of John Hurt's great performances. It is commonsensed,
low-key and committed.
The screenplay introduces several spiritual and theological themes:
the place of prayer in African life, surface and deep faith, the
power of the Eucharist and the issues of God and evil, the meaning
of Jesus' passion and death. In answer to a young girl's question
about loving one's enemies, Fr Christopher says that God might
not like the things we do, those are our choices, but he still
loves all of us. The issue of Jesus' loving sacrifice gives meaning
to Fr Christopher's choices, for giving his life to save others.
Last year, Hotel Rwanda made a strong impression, with its story
of the man who gave refuge to Tutsis in Kigali's prestigious hotel.
This new film is even more powerful and broader in scope.
Shooting Dogs is a film that Catholics and everyone with a sense
of justice should support.
© Independent Catholic News 2006
Contact Independent
Catholic News
tel/fax: +44 (0)20 7267 3616 or email
Homepage • Saint
of the day • Chaplain •
Latest news • Archive • Listings • Pictures •